The legal dispute behind the wanted order

The Hong Kong police took action this time. According to Hong Kong media reports, among the 19 wanted people, including four main culprits, including Yuan Gongyi and He Liangmao, each of whom offered a reward of HK$1 million, and the other 15 accomplices each offered a reward of HK$200,000. These people are accused of establishing the so-called "Hong Kong Parliament" overseas, formulating a false constitution, and blatantly promoting "self-determination", suspected of violating Article 22 of the Hong Kong National Security Law "the crime of subverting the state power."

It is interesting that Western countries shouted at this. A spokesperson for the German Foreign Ministry called this a "worrying transnational repression", and the US State Department has re-produced the old tune and brought out the banner of "human rights".

But ironically, the German Ministry of Interior just banned the far-right organization "Germany Kingdom" this spring, on the grounds that it denies the legitimacy of the government and threatens constitutional order. The same logic is called "maintaining the rule of law" in Germany, but in Hong Kong it becomes "transnational repression"?

According to article 2, paragraph 7 of the Charter of the United Nations, no country shall interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. The wanted actions of the Hong Kong police are fully in line with internationally accepted law enforcement practices, just like the Red Wanted Order mechanism of Interpol.

The US Patriot Act authorized the government to monitor globally, France banned the "last generation" of extreme environmental organizations last year, and Australia expanded its law enforcement power through the Anti-Foreign Intervention Act - all of which are taken for granted. Why is China's turn to blame?

2025 web game rankings-web game server opening list-fun web game collection

Everyone loves to watch. Advertising x

The hypocritical face of the 33-Nation Alliance

The 33 countries that jumped out to point fingers this time are basically old faces: members of the G7 rapid response mechanism, plus some EU brothers and the loyalty of the "Five Eyes Alliance". On August 8, they issued a joint statement as soon as possible, condemning the wanted order as a threat to "human rights and freedoms".

But if you look closely at this list, you will find the tricks. According to statistics from the Financial Times, the trade volume between China and Germany exceeded 230 billion euros in 2023, and German auto giants continued to increase their investment in China; Japan's export dependence on China reached more than 20%, and even the UK is quietly resuming economic and trade exchanges with China.

On one hand, it is an economic "hot commodity" and on the other hand, it is a political "thorn in the eye". This kind of schizophrenia is really amazing.

What’s even more funny is that these countries’ own human rights records can be described as “deeply deeds.” Guantanamo Prison in the United States has still imprisoned unjusted prisoners. The British government has asked Hong Kong rioters to sign a "memorandum of understanding" to restrict rallies, which is actually a disguised review.

According to Reuters, French police used it when forcibly dispersing protesters last year

The European Court of Human Rights also issued a warning for the use of force.

To put it bluntly, the joint statement of these 33 countries is a political show. They know that these chaos in the port

What kind of activities are being engaged in overseas, but they insist on pretending to turn a blind eye and even provide shelter in secret. This trick of selective blindness has long been clearly seen by the international community.

Revisiting the classic "Legend 176 Nostalgic Edition" is launched today!

Everyone loves to watch. Advertising x

China's counterattack is reasonable and well-founded

Faced with the unreasonable accusations from the West, China's response is reasonable and informative. A spokesperson for the Office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Hong Kong made it clear that Hong Kong affairs are purely China's internal affairs and no foreign country has the right to interfere. The Chinese Embassy in Canada also quickly refuted the Canadian side's inappropriate remarks, emphasizing that the so-called "transnational repression" is completely nonsense.

China's position is very clear: safeguarding national security is the sacred right of every sovereign state. These Hong Kong rioters continue to engage in activities that endanger national security overseas, and it is natural for the Chinese government to hold them accountable in accordance with the law.

The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights also clearly stipulates that states have the right to safeguard sovereignty and security, which is the basic principle of international law.

According to Hong Kong media, the SAR government is considering strengthening law enforcement cooperation with relevant countries through a bilateral judicial assistance agreement. Although Western countries publicly clamor for not cooperating with extradition, their attitude in private may not be as tough as they appear.

After all, judicial cooperation among countries has been underway in the fields of anti-terrorism and anti-money laundering, and no country is willing to become a safe haven for criminals.

The issuance of the wanted order marks a new stage in Hong Kong's rule of law construction under the framework of "one country, two systems". The pressure from the West will not only not make China retreat, but will instead prompt relevant departments to speed up the improvement of overseas fugitive pursuit mechanisms and deepen judicial cooperation with "Belt and Road" countries.

The combat power is soaring, and the web version of legend is waiting for you to fight!

Everyone loves to watch. Advertising x

The deep logic of geopolitical game

The collective voices of 33 countries seem to be huge, but in fact they expose the West's "successful" strategy in China's policy. According to data from the International Monetary Fund, the average growth rate of G7 in 2023 was only 1.5%, far lower than China's 5.2%.

Today, when the comparison of economic strength has undergone fundamental changes, the West can only repeatedly make a fuss about the so-called "values".

From Xinjiang to Hong Kong, from Taiwan to sea, the Western smearing routines are exactly the same. They stigmatized China's legitimate measures and tried to occupy a moral commanding height in the international public opinion field. However, the effectiveness of this approach is becoming increasingly limited, and most developing countries' adherence to the principle of non-interference in internal affairs is in sharp contrast to the West.

The UN Human Rights Council voted records show that the number of countries supporting China's position far exceeds the opponents. Regional international organizations such as the African Union, the League of Arab States, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization have expressed their understanding and support for China on issues related to Hong Kong. This shows that the mainstream public opinion of the international community does not buy Western accounts.

The differences within the EU on its policy toward China are becoming increasingly obvious. German Prime Minister Scholz has repeatedly emphasized the need to avoid "decoupling" from China, and countries such as Hungary, Serbia and others are even openly opposing sanctions against China. Even this joint statement of 33 countries cannot hide its internal grudges and differences.

"Big Fish Catch 3" is launched today, and a new upgrade is waiting for you to fight!